Evidence Hub

Influencing factors for severe pertussis among Chinese children: A meta-analysis

Yang Y, Zhuo Y, Che X, Gu W, Lu Z, Wang J, Hu Y, Yu J et al.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2026

Abstract

This study systematically evaluates factors influencing severe pertussis in Chinese children, providing scientific evidence for its prevention and treatment. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang identified literature on factors influencing severe pertussis in Chinese children up to September 30, 2025. We conducted a meta-analysis, and data were combined using either fixed or random models. A total of 24 studies included 839 severe pertussis cases and 4,280 non-severe cases. Severe pertussis was significantly associated with several factors, with the top five strongest associations being: lung consolidation or atelectasis (OR: 15.44; 95%CI: 9.06-26.31), three concave sign (OR: 12.91; 95%CI: 5.46-30.53), elevated C-reactive protein (OR: 5.33; 95%CI: 3.00-9.49), unvaccinated with DTP vaccine (OR: 4.00; 95%CI: 2.86-5.58), and white blood cell count (WMD: 16.42 × 109/L; 95%CI: 9.49-23.36). Early identification of these factors and timely intervention, along with strengthening vaccination efforts for children, can help effectively reduce severe cases.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free