Evidence Hub

Predictors of rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis: a meta-analysis

Liu T, Ji X, Wei Y, Zhong Y, Zhu J, Wang C, Li M

Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2026

2,579 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Objectives: Anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM (MDA5+DM) is frequently complicated by rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). The current study aims to identify predictors for the development of RP-ILD in MDA5+DM, thereby providing an objective basis for early intervention strategies.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases and extracted studies published before December 2024. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Population characteristics, clinical features and laboratory indicators were systematically summarized. For the overall main effects, results were presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CIs.

Results: Twenty-seven cohorts with 2579 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results demonstrated that clinical characteristics predictive of RP-ILD risk factors included advanced age, male sex, fever, skin ulcers and arthritis. Specifically, the RP-ILD group exhibited significantly elevated levels of laboratory parameters including CRP, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), ferritin, ESR, leukocytes, Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), cartilage glycoprotein 39, positive anti-Ro52 antibodies and high-titre anti-MDA5 antibodies. Conversely, the RP-ILD group demonstrated significantly reduced levels of lymphocytes, albumin, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and CD3+CD4+ T cell count.

Conclusion: This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,579 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free