Evidence Hub

Cardioprotective Effects of Apelin in Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Khatami S, Faghihi M, Zarrin A, Sarveazad A, Yousefifard M, Ghorbani A

Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology, 2026

2 citations

Abstract

Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury remains a major clinical challenge, because blood flow restoration can exacerbate tissue damage. Apelin, an endogenous peptide acting through the APJ receptor, has demonstrated cardioprotective effects in experimental models. The APJ receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor widely expressed in cardiovascular tissues, mediates vasodilation, cardiac contractility, and angiogenesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy in myocardial I/R injury. A systematic search in Medline (PubMed), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to 2024, identifying rodent studies of cardiac I/R injury (Langendorff/in vivo) treated with apelin. Studies on pretreatment or chronic ischemia were excluded. A random-effects meta-analysis reported standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals, assessing heterogeneity using the I 2 statistic. From 1765 records, 26 preclinical studies met inclusion criteria. Apelin significantly improved +LVdp/dtmax, -LVdp/dtmax, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular end-systolic pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular developed pressure × heart rate, cardiac output, stroke volume, coronary flow, and left ventricular developed pressure, but did not affect heart rate, mean arterial pressure, left ventricular end-diastolic volume, or left ventricular end-systolic volume. It reduced infarct size, fibrosis, lactate dehydrogenase,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free