Evidence Hub

The effects of various nutritional supplements in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a network meta-analysis

Zeng J, Cheng J, Zhu L, Tang S

BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025

1,975 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of various nutritional supplements as interventions for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) using network meta-analysis.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials on nutritional supplements for COPD patients, with the search updated to March 24, 2025. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed using appropriate tools, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data synthesis was performed using R software, employing network meta-analysis methods to compare the relative efficacy of different nutritional interventions.

Results: Thirty-seven studies involving 1975 COPD patients and 21 different nutritional supplements were analyzed. Butyrate [MD = 2.7, 95% CrI (1.0, 4.4)], Nanocurcumin [MD = 13, 95% CrI (5.4, 21)], and probiotics [MD = 7.1, 95% CrI (5.2, 9.1)] significantly improved Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1). Nanocurcumin also slowed the decline in the ratio of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second to Forced Vital Capacity (FEV1/FVC) [MD = 12, 95% CrI (5.5, 18)]. For exercise endurance, coenzyme Q10 combined with creatine [MD = 63, 95% CrI (36, 90)], Melatonin (MLT) [MD = 46, 95% CrI (1.3, 92)], Nitrate [MD = 30, 95% CrI (19, 41)], and whey proteins [MD = 11, 95% CrI (9.2, 13)] significantly improved 6-minute…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,975 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free