Evidence Hub

Impact of diabetes on outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a GRADE meta-analysis

Mirzohreh ST, Deravi N, Javanshir E, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Roshanravan N

Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2026

47 participants

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and may exacerbate arrhythmic risk, promote structural remodelling and worsen heart failure outcomes. Its overall prognostic impact and effect on cardiac structure and function in adults with HCM remain uncertain.

Method: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane to January 2025 for observational studies comparing adults with HCM-DM versus HCM without DM. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool ORs for clinical outcomes and standardised mean differences (SMDs) for echocardiographic parameters. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework after Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) evaluation. Subgroup, sensitivity and heterogeneity analyses were undertaken.

Result: Eight studies encompassing approximately 47 592 patients met inclusion criteria. DM was associated with higher odds of all-cause mortality (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.58; high certainty), heart failure (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.43; moderate certainty) and atrial fibrillation (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.68; high certainty). The association with atrial fibrillation was most pronounced in patients younger than 50 years (OR 2.55) and attenuated in those with body mass index ≥30 kg/m². HCM-DM was also linked to smaller left ventricular end-diastolic volumes (SMD -0.26) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 47 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free