Evidence Hub

Effects of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) Supplementation on Exercise Performance: A Systematic Review and Three-Level Meta-Analysis

Li X, Li H, Yao S, Hou Y, Chi A

Nutrients, 2026

599 participants

Abstract

Background/objectives: Evidence for herbal ergogenic aids remains uncertain, and ashwagandha trials span heterogeneous performance domains. This review evaluated oral Withania somnifera supplementation on exercise performance and explored participant-, outcome-, formulation-, and supplementation-related moderators.

Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and SPORTDiscus-EBSCO were searched from inception to 1 April 2026. Eligible randomized controlled trials compared oral ashwagandha with placebo or control conditions and reported objective exercise-performance outcomes. Dependent effects were synthesized using restricted-maximum-likelihood three-level random-effects models; 95% prediction intervals, GRADE certainty ratings, subgroup analyses, and dose/duration meta-regressions were reported.

Results: Thirteen trials involving 599 participants contributed 79 effect sizes. Samples were mainly young adults or athletes; reported ages included one 18-40-year trial and one late-adolescent athlete cohort aged 17.4 ± 1.7 years. Trial-level sex composition was four male-only, one female-only, three mixed-sex, and five incompletely reported cohorts. Ashwagandha improved overall exercise performance on average (Hedges' g = 0.47, 95% CI [0.25, 0.69], p 2 = 60%; 95% prediction interval [-0.40, 1.33]), but the prediction interval crossed zero. Exercise type was the clearest moderator (P_between = 0.006): evidence was most consistent for aerobic endurance (g = 0.54, 95%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 599 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free