Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of Resistance Training in People With Down Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Benzo Iglesias MJ, Torres Álamo L, Salazar A, Rocamora Pérez P, Lucena Antón DM

Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2026

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of resistance training (RT) in people with Down syndrome (DS) as a way of improving strength, physical and metabolic function, and possible adverse effects.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs in PubMed, PEDro, Scopus, and WoS databases in September-2023, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022312810). Methodological quality and risk of bias were analysed using the PEDro scale, the Downs & Black Checklist, and the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool.

Results: Sixteen articles were included. RT increased the strength (SMD = 1.88; 95% CI = (1.26; 2.51); I2 = 72%) and improved physical function (SMD = -0.58; 95% CI = (-1.06; -0.11); I2 = 13%), but there were no clear results on whether it improved anthropometric and cardiorespiratory measures. There were no serious adverse effects.

Conclusion: An increase in overall and maximal muscle strength and improved physical function was produced by RT in DS people. RT is a safe technique as serious adverse effects were not produced.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free