Evidence Hub

Bridging the Troponin Blind Window via the miAMI Standard: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Circulating MicroRNA-208 Family

Crabbe A, Antohi AL, Dodi G, Covic A, Abd ElHafeez S, Pesce F, Nistor I

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2026

6,306 participants

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging due to the "diagnostic blind window" of conventional protein biomarkers and the limited sensitivity of electrocardiograms in non ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Cardiospecific circulating microRNAs, specifically the microRNA-208 (miR-208) family, have emerged as promising candidates to bridge this gap. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of circulating miR-208 and outlines a proposed conceptual framework to guide its clinical translation. Materials and Methods: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched up to June 24th, 2026, for clinical studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of circulating miR-208a and/or miR-208b against standard reference definitions for AMI. Risk-of-bias assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool was performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using bivariate random effects modeling, and sources of heterogeneity were explored via subgroup analyses. Results: Forty-one studies enrolling 6306 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 14 were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of circulating miR-208 for AMI detection were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.81-0.94) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.83-0.94), respectively. Marked between-study heterogeneity was observed. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly higher diagnostic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,306 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free