Evidence Hub

The acute effects of caffeine, creatine, and carbohydrate mouth rinse combined with conditioning activity on subsequent sports performance: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

Yan-Feng Li, Bopeng Qiu, H. Kuai, Kongyun Huang, HengXian Liu, Mingyang Zhang, Ming-Yue Yin, Yilin Zhang et al.

Frontiers in Nutrition, 2025

198 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) refers to the acute improvement in sports performance following a conditioning activity (CA), commonly used in warm-up protocols and complex training. While CA alone has demonstrated performance benefits, the effects of combining CA-induced PAPE with supplements (e.g., caffeine, creatine, or carbohydrate mouth rinse) remain unclear. Objectives This study was to (i) assess the effects of PAPE combined with supplements on sports performance and fatigue resistance compared to PAPE + placebo, warm-up + supplements, or warm-up alone, and (ii) synthesize direct and indirect evidence on performance outcomes using network meta-analysis. Methods Searches were conducted across three databases. Eligible studies were randomized controlled or crossover trials involving recreationally active individuals, comparing PAPE combined with supplements to interventions (i.e., PAPE + placebo, warm-up + supplements, or warm-up alone). Outcomes related to sports performance or fatigue were analyzed using a multilevel Bayesian approach incorporating pairwise and multiple (network) comparisons. Results Ten studies involving 198 participants were included. Current evidence indicates that the probabilities of positive effects (effect size > 0) on sports performance for PAPE combined with supplements compared to PAPE + placebo, warm-up + supplements, warm-up + placebo, and warm-up alone were 90.83, 85.09, 92.29, and 88.10%, respectively.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 198 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free