Evidence Hub

Safety profile and dose-dependent adverse events of upadacitinib in randomized clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cong Zhang, Zhi-Wen Fu, Jinmei Liu, Shijun Li, Xu Chen, Yi Zhang, Jiyi Xie

Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2025

9,547 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Introduction Upadacitinib, one of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, has gained global approval for treating various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, despite the FDA’s black box warning on all JAK inhibitors, further research is necessary to verify the potential risks associated specifically with upadacitinib. Therefore, this study conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety profile of upadacitinib and explore potential dose-related differences. Methods Relevant English publications were identified through a comprehensive search of eligible databases conducted in March 2024 and subsequently updated in May 2025. The inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials that included safety data on upadacitinib. Results A total of 9,547 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. Upadacitinib treatment was associated with an increased risk of hepatic disorder, neutropenia, acne, herpes zoster, and increased creatine phosphokinase levels. Notably, the risks of hepatic disorder, neutropenia, and acne also exhibited a dose-dependent relationship. However, there was no significant association between upadacitinib treatment and an elevated risk of renal dysfunction, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), or venous thromboembolic event (VTE). Conclusion This study reveals that upadacitinib generally has a favorable safety profile, with increased risks of hepatic disorder, neutropenia,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 9,547 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free