Evidence Hub

The role of creatine kinase in distinguishing generalized tonic–clonic seizures from psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES) and syncope: a retrospective study and meta-analysis of 1300 patients

R. Abdelnaby, A. Elgenidy, J. Heckelmann, Mahmoud Mostafa Bedewy, Ahmed Samy Shabib, M. Ebrahim, K. A. Elmenawi, Imene Maallem et al.

Neurological Research and Practice, 2023

1,086 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Background/aim As the clinical differentiation between epileptic seizures, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures (PNES), and syncope depends mainly on a detailed report of the event, which may not be available, an objective assessment of a potential biochemical analysis is needed. We aimed to investigate whether serum creatine kinase (CK) could be used to differentiate epileptic seizure from PNES and syncope and to assess the strength of evidence present. Methods We directed a retrospective cohort study coupled with a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that measured CK in patients with epilepsy, PNES, syncope, and healthy controls. Results The cohort study, which traced 202 patients, showed that the CK level was significantly higher 48 h after the event in the epilepsy group versus patients with syncope ( p < 0.01) Along with 1086 patients obtained through a database search for meta-analysis, CK level compared to different types of seizures from PNES was higher in epileptic seizure patients with a mean difference of 568.966 mIU/ml (95% CI 166.864, 971.067). The subgroup analysis of CK showed that it was higher in GTCS compared to syncope with a mean difference of 125.39 mIU/ml (95% CI 45.25, 205.52). Discussion Increased serum levels of CK have been associated mainly with epileptic seizures in relation to non-epileptic events. However, further studies would try to explore the variation in measurements and any other potential diagnostic marker. Conclusion The cohort…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,086 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free