Evidence Hub

Effect of Astragalus injection treatment for viral myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Dinala Jialiken, Lichao Qian, Shi-Wu Wen, Shuai Ren, Yadong Fan, Yi-Xuan Dong, Chong Zou

European Journal of Medical Research, 2025

2,793 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Astragalus injection has been utilized in traditional Chinese medicine to treat a variety of diseases. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of Astragalus injection in the treatment of viral myocarditis. English databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, and Chinese databases of Sino Med, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the VIP Information Resource Integration Service Platform, and Wanfang Data Information Site, were searched from their inception until May 1, 2024. The outcome measures of this study included the effectiveness rate, creatine kinase (CK), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), creatine kinase Isoenzyme (CK-MB), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), cardiac troponin I (cTnI), and electrocardiogram (ECG). Twenty-six studies were included in this analysis, comprising a total of 2793 patients. Meta-analyses indicated that, compared to standard treatment alone, the Astragalus injection group demonstrated significant advantages, achieving an effectiveness rate of 92.79% (1094 cases). In contrast, the control group, which included 1108 cases, had an effectiveness rate of 77.71% (861 cases). Additionally, the Astragalus injection group exhibited the following benefits for patients affected by viral myocarditis: decreasing ∆AST [weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 14.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) (− 24.17, − 4.30), P < 0.05]; ∆CK [weighted mean difference (WMD) = − 34.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) (− 48.03, −…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,793 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free