Evidence Hub

Efficacy of trimetazidine for myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat models: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xiaobin Zhang, Zhanhui Duan, Yan-Pu Yu, Chunjing Li, Mingyao Hao, Yu-Ning Ma, Yu-Xia Ma, Dong-Qing Du

PeerJ, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Context Trimetazidine (TMZ) is used as a medication for ischemic heart disease treatment. Recently, several animal models have been studied in relation to the research on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury (MIRI) treatment. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of TMZ in rat MIRI models to evaluate TMZ’s therapeutic efficacy. Methods We systematically searched eight databases for studies on TMZ in rat MIRI models. We utilized two literature quality assessment criteria to evaluate the paper quality. Assessment of TMZ treatment efficacy was based on the outcomes, as well as on the subgroup analysis. This study was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42022377728). Results After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 eligible studies were shortlisted from 405 studies. We found that, in rat MIRI models, TMZ dramatically boosted the superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels while decreasing the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine kinase isoenzyme (CK-MB), and the infarct size. In addition, the duration of myocardial ischemia, reperfusion duration, dosage, rat species and mode of administration influenced the effectiveness of TMZ. The result indicated that TMZ had a considerable therapeutic effect on the duration of myocardial ischemia at less than 30 min as well as on the duration of reperfusion at 120–180 min. In fact, it was more effective when administered intravenously and via gavage at doses of 3–10 mg/kg.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free