From Fads to Facts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Therapy for Muscle Recovery
Abstract
Recovery is essential for athletic performance and injury prevention. Athletes use intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) to aid muscle fatigue recovery, but its efficacy is unclear. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness of IPC on the recovery of muscle fatigue. A systematic search for related studies published from inception to August 2024 using the following databases was conducted: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and PEDro. Twenty-seven studies (554 healthy adults) that compared IPC recovery and any other treatment after exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) were included. Each study used different EIMD protocols and a plethora of assessment instruments including performance tests, fatigue scores, soreness and pain score, and inflammatory markers. The meta-analysis showed that there were statistically significant small effects of soreness and pain (Effect Size (ES) = −0.45; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: −0.65 to −0.25) and creatine kinase values (ES = 0.36; 95% CI: 0.37–0.68). A nonstatistically significant effect was found for the rest of the variables (ES = −0.17–3.12). Therefore, although IPC seems effective in reducing pain and soreness, its effects on recovery after intense exercise remain inconclusive. The current evidence is limited and does not allow any definitive recommendations for clinical practice.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 554 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic lumbar decompressive laminectomy in patients with spinal stenosis: A randomized controlled trial
- A whey protein-based multi-ingredient nutritional supplement stimulates gains in lean body mass and strength in healthy older men: A randomized controlled trial
- Supplement-based nutritional strategies to tackle frailty: A multifactorial, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial of creatine monohydrate as adjunctive treatment for bipolar depression
- Creatine supplementation (3 g/day) and bone health in older women: a 2-year, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
- A Multi-Ingredient Nutritional Supplement in Combination With Resistance Exercise and High-Intensity Interval Training Improves Cognitive Function and Increases N-3 Index in Healthy Older Men: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.