Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Therapeutic Impact of L-Carnitine on Postoperative Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis

Evangelista Maria Pangkahila, Made Yudha Asrithari Dewi, A. I. Wayan Harimawan, Josua Silitonga

Bali Medical and Wellness Journal, 2025

365 participants

Abstract

Background: L-Carnitine (LC) plays a crucial role in transporting long-chain fatty acids into mitochondria for oxidation, which is particularly important for the heart and skeletal muscles. Additionally, it acts as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, helping to protect tissues from damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS). This study aims to evaluate the effect of LC on postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines and searched Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing L-Carnitine to placebo in CABG patients. We focused on outcomes related to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and serum creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) levels. Data were analyzed using a random-effects model, with results reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), considering statistical significance at p < 0.05.

Results: The analysis included five RCTs involving 365 CABG patients, with LC doses ranging from 2 to 6 g per day, administered from one month before to 180 days after surgery. The results showed that LC significantly improved LVEF (Weighted Mean Difference [WMD]: 3.22%, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.28 to 6.16, P = 0.0001). Additionally, LC treatment resulted in a reduction of serum creatine kinase-MB (WMD: -12.75, 95% CI: -22.46 to -3.05, P = 0.01). However, there…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 365 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free