Evidence Hub

Exploring Diagnostic Markers and Therapeutic Targets in Parkinson’s Disease: A Comprehensive 1H-NMR Metabolomic Analysis – Systematic Review

Andrzej Wasilewski, Eliza Wasilewska, Agata Serrafi

Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 2025

4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) affects millions of people globally. Accurate early diagnosis remains a challenge due to the lack of specific biomarkers. This systematic review explores the potential of 1H-NMR metabolomics in identifying diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for PD. A comprehensive analysis was conducted across databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase, focusing on studies that utilized 1H-NMR spectroscopy to profile metabolites associated with PD progression. The review identifies key metabolites—glutamate, taurine, myo-inositol, glutamine, and creatine—that play critical roles in the pathophysiology of PD. Glutamate, linked to excitotoxicity and neuronal degeneration, emerges as a prominent target for therapeutic intervention, while taurine is associated with oxidative stress. Myo-inositol, a key regulator of autophagy, underscores the biochemical dysregulation associated with PD, similar to glutamine and glutamate. Creatine’s role in neuronal energy metabolism suggests potential avenues for treatment focused on energy supplementation. The reproducibility of metabolite findings varied, indicating the complexity of PD’s metabolomic landscape. Despite challenges in consistency, these metabolites hold promise as biomarkers for diagnosing PD and tracking disease progression. The review underscores the need for further validation of these markers and their integration with other omics technologies to enhance PD management. By…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free