Evidence Hub

Effect of mannitol plus hypertonic saline combination versus hypertonic saline monotherapy on acute kidney injury after traumatic brain injury

Narayan SW, Castelino R, Hammond N, Patanwala AE

Journal of critical care, 2020

326 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of mannitol plus hypertonic saline combination (MHS) versus hypertonic saline monotherapy (HS) on renal function in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Hypertonic Saline Trial Shock Study and Traumatic Brain Injury Study. The study cohort included a propensity matched subset of patients with TBI who received MHS or HS. The primary outcome measure was the maximum serum creatinine value during critical illness.

RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 163 patients in the MHS group and 163 patients in the HS group (n = 326). The maximum serum creatinine value during hospitalization was 82 ± 47 μmol/L (0.86 ± 0.26 mg/dL) in the MHS group and 76 ± 23 μmol/L (0.92 ± 0.53 mg/dL) in the HS group (difference -6 μmol/L, 95% CI -14 to 2 μmol/L, p = .151). The lowest eGFR during hospitalization was 108 ± 25 mL/min in the MHS group and 112 ± 24 mL/min in the HS group (difference -4 mL/min, 95% CI -1 to 9 mLmin, p = .150).

CONCLUSIONS: The addition of mannitol to HS did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction compared to HS alone in patients with TBI.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 326 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free