Evidence Hub

Fenoldopam: renal and splanchnic effects in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting

Halpenny M, Lakshmi S, O'Donnell A, O'Callaghan-Enright S, Shorten GD

Anaesthesia, 2001

31 participants

Abstract

Impairment of renal and splanchnic perfusion during and after cardiopulmonary bypass may be responsible for acute renal failure and endotoxin-mediated systemic inflammation, respectively. We hypothesised that fenoldopam, a selective dopamine receptor agonist, would preserve renal function after cardiopulmonary bypass through its selective renal vasodilatory and natriuretic effects, and increase gastrointestinal mucosal perfusion by selective splanchnic vasodilation. We examined the effects of fenoldopam on haemodynamic parameters, creatinine clearance, fractional excretion of sodium, urine output, free water clearance and gastric mucosal pH in 31 patients undergoing elective coronary revascularisation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive continuous infusions of fenoldopam 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) (n = 16) or placebo (n = 15). Renal parameters were measured: during a 24-h period before hospital admission, during cardiopulmonary bypass, from completion of cardiopulmonary bypass until 4 h later, from 4 to 8 h after cardiopulmonary bypass, and from 8 to 14 h after cardiopulmonary bypass. Gastric intramucosal pH was measured using a gastric tonometer before, during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. In the placebo group, but not the fenoldopam group, mean (SD) creatinine clearance decreased after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, from 107 (36) to 71 (22) ml x min(-1) (p < 0.01) and from 107 (36) to 79 (26) ml x min(-1) (p < 0.01) for the 0-4 h and 4-8 h intervals…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free