Evidence Hub

Effects of acute creatine supplementation on cardiac and vascular responses in older men; a randomized controlled trial

Adrian Aron, Erynn Landrum, Adam Schneider, Megan Via, Logan Evans, Eric S. Rawson

Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2024

6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In the recent years creatine has been shown promising results in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, myopathies and dystrophies. Cardiovascular diseases could be another pathology that can benefit from creatine supplementation, considering the influence on the risk factors associated with the development of cardiovascular diseases including reduction in chronic inflammation, and improved control of hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of short-term creatine supplementation on cardiac and vascular health in older adults.

METHODS

Males between the ages of 55-80 were randomly assigned to three groups: creatine, placebo and control. Creatine or placebo was provided for 7-day supplementation, at a dose of 20g/day. Testing was performed at the same time of the day at baseline and on the eighth day. Vascular responses were assessed using an arterial pulse wave velocity equipment, while cardiac assessment was performed using an impedance cardiography device.

RESULTS

The placebo group was older (71.1 ± 8.2 yr.) compared to creatine (61.4 ± 5.2 yr.) and control (62.5 ± 7.1 yr.). Cardio-ankle vascular index improved just in the creatine group (8.7 ± 0.5 to 8.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.03). While the upstroke time of the placebo and control groups did not change after 7 days, the creatine group had a nonsignificant reduction, 178.9 ± 26.5 ms to 158.4 ± 28.6 ms, p = 0.07. Similar tendency was seen with the systolic blood…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free