Evidence Hub

Effects of high-load, velocity-intentional variable resistance training combined with creatine supplementation on neuroplasticity, oxidative stress, inflammation, physical function, cognitive performance and quality of life in older adults: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Julio J Fernández-Garrido, Ezequiel G Martin, Ángel Saez-Berlanga, Pedro Gargallo-Bayo, Javier Gené-Morales, Carlos Alix-Fages, P. Jiménez-Martínez, Óscar Caballero et al.

Experimental Gerontology, 2026

57 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare two 16-week high-load, velocity-intentional resistance training programs-elastic bands (HL-VIRT-EB) vs. water-based (HL-VIRT-AQ)-combined with creatine or placebo supplementation on neuroplasticity, oxidative stress, inflammation, strength, physical function, cognition, and quality of life in older adults.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial, 103 community-dwelling older adults (57 women, 46 men; 68.2 ± 4.6 y) were assigned to HL-VIRT-EB + Creatine, HL-VIRT-EB + Placebo, HL-VIRT-AQ + Creatine, HL-VIRT-AQ + Placebo, Control+Creatine, or Control+Placebo. Training was performed 3×/week (60 min). Creatine was consumed daily (3 g). Outcomes included brain-derived neurotrophic factor, F2-isoprostanes (F2-iso), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), isokinetic strength (knee/elbow, 60°·s-1), handgrip, timed up-and-go, 30-s chair-stand, 6-min walk, trail-making test, and SF-36. ANCOVAs and correlations were conducted.

RESULTS

Both training modalities produced significant improvements in neurocognitive biomarkers, oxidative/inflammatory profiles, strength, functional performance and quality of life (p < 0.05). HL-VIRT-AQ yielded greater reductions in F2-iso and TNF-α and larger gains in functional tests compared to HL-VIRT-EB (d = 0.12-1.18), which elicited superior upper-limb strength gains. Creatine provided additional benefits, increasing GPx, reducing IL-6/TNF-α and improving strength and function when combined…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 57 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free