Evidence Hub

Neurometabolite Changes After Transcranial Photobiomodulation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Dose-Dependent Effects

D. R. A. Coelho, Ü. Tural, Aura Maria Hurtado Puerto, K. A. Collins, M. Gersten, Z. Parincu, Kari Siu, Dan V. Iosifescu et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025

33 participants · 4 citations

Abstract

Background: Transcranial photobiomodulation (t-PBM) is a promising non-invasive therapy for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). MDD is associated with altered brain metabolism, including changes in N-acetylaspartate (NAA), choline (Cho), and creatine (Cr). This study assessed the effects of varying t-PBM doses on neurometabolite levels in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and their correlations with clinical outcomes. Methods: In this randomized, sham-controlled, cross-over study, 33 adults with MDD received one session of t-PBM at low, medium, and high doses and a sham treatment. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) measured NAA, Cho, and Cr pre- and post-treatment. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ). Statistical analyses included paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for neurometabolite changes, and linear mixed-effects regression models for t-PBM dose, neurometabolites, and time effects. Results: NAA levels increased significantly (7.52 ± 0.777 to 8.12 ± 1.05 mmol/L for one session; 7.36 ± 0.85 to 7.85 ± 0.68 mmol/L across all sessions); however, these changes were not associated with specific t-PBM doses or sham. No significant changes were observed for Cho and Cr levels. Positive correlations were found between Cho levels and MADRS scores (r = 0.59, p = 0.017), and negative correlations between Cr levels and SDQ scores at the medium dose (r…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 33 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free