Evidence Hub

The acute effect of beta‐guanidinopropionic acid versus creatine or placebo in healthy men (ABC‐Trial): A randomized controlled first‐in‐human trial

F. Karamat, Deborah L. Horjus, Y. Haan, L. van der Woude, M. Schaap, I. Oudman, G. V. van Montfrans, R. Nieuwland et al.

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2017

24 participants · 16 citations

Abstract

Aims Increasing evidence indicates that the ATP‐generating enzyme creatine kinase (CK) is involved in hypertension. CK rapidly regenerates ATP from creatine phosphate and ADP. Recently, it has been shown that beta‐guanidinopropionic acid (GPA), a kidney‐synthesized creatine analogue and competitive CK inhibitor, reduced blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. To further develop the substance as a potential blood pressure‐lowering agent, we assessed the tolerability of a sub‐therapeutic GPA dose in healthy men. Methods In this active and placebo‐controlled, triple‐blind, single‐centre trial, we recruited 24 healthy men (18–50 years old, BMI 18.5–29.9 kg m−2) in the Netherlands. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to one week daily oral administration of GPA 100 mg, creatine 5 g, or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the tolerability of GPA, in an intent‐to‐treat analysis. Results Twenty‐four randomized participants received the allocated intervention and 23 completed the study. One participant in the placebo arm dropped out for personal reasons. GPA was well tolerated, without serious or severe adverse events. No abnormalities were reported with GPA use in clinical safety parameters, including physical examination, laboratory studies, or 12‐Lead ECG. At day 8, mean plasma GPA was 213.88 (SE 0.07) in the GPA arm vs. 32.75 (0.00) nmol l−1 in the placebo arm, a mean difference of 181.13 (95% CI 26.53–335.72). Conclusion In this first‐in‐human trial, low‐dose…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free