Evidence Hub

Effects of Kinesio Taping on the Relief of Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Zeynep Hazar Kanik, Seyit Çıtaker, Canan Yilmaz Demirtas, Neslihan Celik Bukan, B. Çelik, G. Gunaydin

Journal of sport rehabilitation, 2019

27 participants · 22 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of Kinesio taping (KT) on delayed onset muscle soreness.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Clinical laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-four nonathletic volunteers were assigned randomly to KT (n = 27) and placebo KT (n = 27) groups.

INTERVENTIONS

The intense exercise protocol consisted of 100 consecutive drop jumps from a 0.60-m-high platform. Kinesio tape was applied with the fan technique on the quadriceps muscles in the KT group. The placebo KT group received the Kinesio tape with no technique and tension.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Muscle soreness, maximal isometric quadriceps muscle strength, vertical jump height, and blood analyses (creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, myoglobin, and C-reactive protein) were measured preexercise, immediately postexercise, 48 hours postexercise, and 72 hours postexercise.

RESULTS

There was a significant effect of time in all outcome measures (P .05). The intensity of muscle soreness was significantly lower in the KT group relative to the placebo KT group at 72 hours postexercise (P = .01). The serum creatine kinase level was significantly higher in the KT group compared with the placebo KT group at 72 hours postexercise (P = .01). There were no statistically significant differences between groups for the other outcome measures (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that KT intervention following the intense exercise protocol reduced muscle soreness. However, it…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free