Evidence Hub

Discrepancy between antibiotics administered in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and susceptibility of isolated pathogens in respiratory samples: multicentre study in the primary care setting

Querol-Ribelles JM, Molina J, Naberan K, Esteban E, Herreras A, Garcia-de-Lomas J

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 2006

1,537 participants

Abstract

A national multicentre prevalence study was undertaken to determine the bacterial strains associated with mild-to-moderate acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) in the primary care setting and the susceptibility of isolated pathogens to different antimicrobials usually prescribed to these patients. All samples were processed by a central reference laboratory. Microdilution tests were carried out to establish the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of various antimicrobials. A double-disk test was performed to establish the macrolide resistance phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Tests to detect the presence of beta-lactamase in Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis and polymerase chain reaction to detect the presence of ermB and mefA genes in S. pneumoniae isolates were also performed. A total of 1537 patients were included in the trial and 468 microorganisms were isolated from sputum samples, with the most frequent isolates being S. pneumoniae (34.8%), M. catarrhalis (23.9%) and H. influenzae (12.6%). Resistance rates of pneumococci were 47.2% for penicillin, 1.2% for amoxicillin, 34.3% for macrolides (87.5% of which showed high-level resistance), 13.6% for cefuroxime/axetil and 4.2% for levofloxacin. No bacterial isolates showed resistance to telithromycin. Empirical antibiotic treatment was prescribed to 98.3% of patients, including macrolides to 36.6%, amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid to 32.3% and fluoroquinolones to 16.1%. In…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,537 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free