Bioequivalence of Levocetirizine Hydrochloride Granules (Kangzhitai) in Healthy Subjects
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Levocetirizine hydrochloride is the R-enantiomer of cetirizine, which is a new-generation histamine H1 receptor antagonist with high safety, selectivity, and affinity. As a high-efficiency non-sedating antihistamine, levocetirizine hydrochloride has been widely used in the clinical treatment of skin, respiratory, and eye allergies. However, the bioavailability of levocetirizine hydrochloride granules remains to be determined. The study examined the relative bioavailability of the test drug (levocetirizine hydrochloride granules (Kangzhitai®)) and determined whether Kangzhitai® was bioequivalent to the reference drug (levocetirizine (Xyzal®)) in healthy individuals.
METHODS: Twenty eligible healthy male subjects were randomly divided into two groups. Group one received 5 mg of Kangzhitai®, followed by a 10-day wash-out period and 5 mg of Xyzal® on day 11. Group two received the same doses but in a reverse sequence. The subjects fasted for 12 h, and blood samples were collected before (blank) and after administration. The plasma concentration of Kangzhitai® was determined by HPLC-MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using DAS 2.0 software.
RESULTS: The main pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, Tmax, T1/2, AUC0-48, and AUC0-∞ of the Xyzal® and Kangzhitai® groups were as follows: (218.4 ± 46.4) μg/L vs. (213.6 ± 39.3) μg/L, (0.73 ± 0.32)/h vs. (0.75±0.3)/h, (9.2 ± 2.0) h vs. (8.9 ± 2.7) h, (1594.0 ± 337.2) μg·h/L vs. (1652.6 ± 383.5) μg·h/L, and (1683.2 ±…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.