Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Levocetirizine and Cetirizine in Reducing Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis in Ragweed Sensitive Subjects Exposed to Pollen Challenge in an Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU)
Abstract
Controlled conditions of the EEU allow a reliable assessment of the efficacy and a determination of the action onset, action intensity and duration of effect of levocetirizine and cetirizine in order to establish the relative efficacy of these two drugs available for the treatment of SAR.
Conditions: Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.
Primary outcome: Mean change from baseline in major symptom complex score over Period 2 (21-29 hours after drug intake on Day 2)..
Enrollment: 570 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 570 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.