Efficacy and Safety of Concomitant Montelukast Sodium and Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR) Patients : A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Multicenter Phase 3 Clinical Trial
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the efficacy of Concomitant Montelukast Sodium and Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride is superior to that of Levocetirizine and Montelukast monotherapies and to compare the safety and tolerability of Concomitant Montelukast Sodium and Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride to those of Levocetirizine and Montelukast monotherapies in Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR) patients.
Conditions: Perennial Allergic Rhinitis.
Primary outcome: Mean Daytime Nasal Symptom Score.
Enrollment: 283 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 283 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.