Double-blind, 3 Parallel Randomized Groups, Therapeutic Confirmatory. Clinical Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Levocetirizine 5 mg and Montelukast 10 mg to Placebo in Reducing SAR Symptoms in Ragweed Sensitive Subjects in an EEC.
Abstract
To compare the clinical efficacy of levocetirizine 5 mg and montelukast 10 mg, administered once daily during two consecutive days, on symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis occurring in subjects exposed to ragweed pollen in an environmental exposure unit.
Conditions: Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal.
Primary outcome: Compare efficacy of Levocetirizine 5 mg to montelukast 10 mg as measured by the mean change from baseline of major symptoms related to SAR in ragweed sensitive subjects..
Enrollment: 403 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 403 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.