A Single Centre, Single Dose, Open-label, Randomized, 2-part, 2-way Crossover Study to Determine the Bioequivalence of Levocetirizine Oral Disintegrating Tablet Given With Water and Without Water Compared to Levocetirizine Immediate Release Tablet in Healthy Japanese Male Subjects
Abstract
This study will be an open-label, randomized 2-way cross-over study to evaluate bioequivalence study between levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT in healthy Japanese male subjects. Approximately 48 subjects will participate in this study to receive a single dose treatments of levocetirizine ODT 5 milligram (mg) or levocetirizine IRT 5 mg. In Part 1, subjects will randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose of levocetirizine ODT 5 mg with water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT and levocetirizine IRT when taken with water in the fasted state will be assessed. In Part 2, subjects will be randomized in 1:1 ratio (12 in each Period) in Period 1 and 2 to receive single dose levocetirizine ODT 5 mg without water or single dose levocetirizine IRT 5 mg with water in fasted state. In this part, comparison of bioavailability of levocetirizine ODT without water and levocetirizine IRT with water in the fasted state will be assessed. There will be at least a 5-day wash out period between the intervention periods. The duration of each subject's participation in each part will be approximately 7 weeks from screening to follow-up.
Conditions: Rhinitis.
Primary outcome: Part 1: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero Time (Pre-dose) to the Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC[0-t]) of Levocetirizine; Part 2: AUC(0-t) of…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 72 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.