Efficacy comparison of combined montelukast-antihistamine and montelukast monotherapy in allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background.Combination therapy with montelukast and oral antihistamines is commonly used in allergic rhinitis (AR), but its comparative benefit over montelukast monotherapy remains unclear.This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy compared to monotherapy, with a focus on symptom-specific outcomes.Methods.A comprehensive search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was conducted through April 2025.We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials comparing montelukast combined with oral antihistamines to montelukast monotherapy in patients with AR.Outcomes included total symptom scores, Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) scores, and individual symptom domains.Pooled effects were analyzed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results.Thirteen RCTs enrolling 2,950 patients were identified.Combination therapy significantly improved daytime symptoms (SMD = 0.25; 95%CI 0.15 to 0.35), M a n u s c r i p t a c c e p t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n with limited benefit for nighttime symptoms (SMD = 0.10; 95%CI -0.01 to 0.21) or RQLQ scores (SMD = 0.11; 95%CI -0.05 to 0.26).In subgroup analysis, all combinations with loratadine, desloratadine, or levocetirizine showed greater efficacy than monotherapy in improving daytime symptoms.However, only the levocetirizine-based combination demonstrated a significant benefit for nighttime symptoms.When analyzed by…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,950 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.