Evaluating montelukast-second-generation antihistamine combinations versus monotherapy in allergic rhinitis: A network meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an atopic condition affecting over 400 million people worldwide, impairing quality of life and often leading to complications such as asthma and sinusitis. Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, is often used in combination with second-generation antihistamines (sgAHs) to enhance symptom control. However, the relative efficacy of different montelukast-sgAH combinations remains unclear. Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of montelukast combined with various sgAHs versus montelukast monotherapy in patients with AR. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing montelukast-sgAH combinations to montelukast alone were identified from 5 electronic databases up to 2025. Outcomes included Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS; 0–12), Daytime and Nighttime Nasal Symptom Scores (DNSS, NNSS; 0–3), and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ; 0–6). Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2.0. A frequentist network meta-analysis with subgroup analysis and meta-regression was performed using RStudio and Jeffreys’s Amazing Statistics Program. Results: Seventeen RCTs involving 2,655 participants were included. For TNSS improvement, montelukast + desloratadine combination is significantly better than monotherapy in adults (mean difference [MD] = −0.92 [−1.15 to −0.69]) and children (MD = −1.95 [−3.46 to −0.44]). Effects on RQLQ and DNSS were inconsistent, while NNSS improved with…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,655 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.