Evaluation of different therapies in indian patients with chronic urticaria: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials in the last decade
Abstract
The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to chronic urticaria in Indian patients evaluating different treatment options published in the last decade. A systematic literature search of PubMed/Medline was performed using keywords “Study(ti) OR trial(ti) AND urticaria(ti) AND “2009”(Date-Publication): “2020”(Date-Publication). All the selected articles were screened for author information and study design. Only RCTs from India were considered for the final analysis. Out of 205 articles retrieved, 11 RCTs were selected for the systematic review. Six RCTs evaluated the effects of antihistamines (loratadine, levocetirizine, rupatadine, and olopatadine) in Indian patients with chronic urticaria. The results show that these agents are effective and well tolerated in the treatment of chronic urticaria. Other therapies evaluated through RCTs included levocetirizine plus montelukast, add-on methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, narrowband ultraviolet B, psoralen plus ultraviolet A, and vitamin D. Levocetirizine 5 mg plus montelukast 10 mg combination was found to be as effective as levocetirizine 10 mg in patients not responding to levocetirizine 5 mg/day. A small trial did not prove the benefit of methotrexate add-on therapy with antihistamine. Azathioprine trials show that it can be a useful option in resource-limited settings. Second-generation antihistamines represent the most commonly investigated therapies…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 10 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.