The effect of 5-days of cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine 120 and 180 mg, levocetirizine, loratadine treatment on the histamine-induced skin reaction and skin blood flow--a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
Abstract
THE AIM: of this study was to compare the effect of the following antihistamines: cetirizine 10mg, desloratadine 5mg, fexofenadine 120 and 180mg, levocetirizine 5mg, loratadine 10mg, and placebo, administered in the recommended doses over the period of 5 days, on the visually assessed histamine-induced skin reaction, using the Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty two volunteers (aged 18-22) who gave a written consent before entering the study, were randomized in seven groups of six subjects each. The skin prick test with histamine solution of 10mg/ml was performed on the ventral forearm, 10 cm from the elbow, before and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, and 24 hours after drug administration, as well as once daily for the next 4 days of antihistamine drug or placebo intake, and 9 days following the treatment. Diameters of wheal and flare as well as the LDF index measured with Periflux PF3 flowmeter and skin probe, 5mm from the histamine-provoked area, were assessed 10 minutes after performing the above-mentioned skin prick test.
RESULTS: The current study revealed that during the 5-day treatment with recommended doses of cetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, levocetirizine, and loratadine, a significant reduction of histamine-induced wheal, flare and the LDF index was observed as compared to the initial values and placebo intake, reaching the maximum value within the first 24 hours, weakening on the next day, and then gradually increasing during the…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.