Reinitiating ocrelizumab with a full 600 mg dose after extended treatment interruption: No increased risk of infusion-related reactions
Abstract
Background: Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are a common side-effect of ocrelizumab (OCR), with the highest risk occurring during treatment initiation. To minimize IRR risk, the first dose is split into two 300 mg infusions over two weeks. Subsequent doses are administered every six months as a 600 mg infusion. After treatment interruptions, some physicians restart with two separate 300 mg infusions due to concern about IRRs. This study evaluates IRR occurrence following a 600 mg infusion after extended treatment interruption.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who received at least one 600 mg OCR infusion between June 2018 and January 2024 at Amsterdam UMC. Infusions were categorized by interval duration: normal (6 months), moderate (7-9 months) and long (>9 months). Logistic regression analyzed the IRR occurrence.
Results: 1438 infusions, in 275 patients, were analyzed. Neither the moderate interval group (306 infusions, OR = 0.914, p = 0.77) nor the long interval group (56 infusions, OR = 0.928, p = 0.575) had significantly higher odds of developing IRRs compared to the normal interval group.
Conclusion: Despite the retrospective design and smaller sample sizes in the moderate and long interval groups, our findings indicate that administering OCR as a single 600 mg infusion after a prolonged interval is safe regarding IRR occurrence.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 275 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.