Effects of montelukast on allergic rhinitis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of montelukast in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) in children through a meta-analysis.
Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were retrieved for randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on montelukast for pediatric AR from databases inception to June 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan5.3. Effect size was expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
Result: A total of 14 studies were included. Those treated with non-montelukast regimens were set as Group A, and those treated with montelukast were set as Group B. Meta-analysis showed that the total effective rate in group B was significantly higher than that in group A [OR=0.32 (0.20, 0.50), PWMD=0.83 (0.13, 1.54), P=0.02]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups [OR=1.00 (0.71, 1.39), P=0.98]. In addition, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and the percentage of eosinophils (EOS).
Conclusion: Montelukast improves the total effective rate and clinical symptoms of pediatric AR with a favorable safety profile.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.