Secondary Non-Response to Biologic Treatment in Patients with Severe Asthma
Abstract
Biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of severe asthma (SA), offering significant symptom control and reduced exacerbations for many patients. However, up to 25% of individuals do not show satisfactory responses to these treatments and are categorized as non-responders. Definitions of response and primary non-response to biologics in SA are well-established. In secondary nonresponse, patients show initial response to biological treatment in the first 6-12 months but later lose asthma control, and in SA this phenomenon remains undefined and unstudied in literature. We present 4 cases of severe asthma treated with different biologic agents. All patients demonstrated significant clinical improvement during the first 12 months of therapy but followed by a gradual loss of asthma control, indicative of secondary nonresponse. We discuss the clinical features, potential mechanisms, and implications of secondary nonresponse to biologics in severe asthma, highlighting an unmet need for further research to define this phenomenon and guide future therapeutic strategies.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.