Pitfalls and Challenges in Oral Plasma Cell Mucositis: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Plasma cell mucositis (PCM) is an unusual idiopathic disorder characterized by dense infiltrates of plasma cells in submucosa. Clinical phenotypes of oral plasma cell mucositis (o-PMC) are heterogenous. A systematic review has been conducted, aiming to synthesize the available evidence on o-PCM. Literature search, study design, and data analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. The SPIDER and the PICO tools were used to structure the research question. In all, 79 case reports and 19 case series on a total of 158 patients (85 females and 73 males; average age: 44.1 years) were identified. Among oral sites involved, gingiva (65.82%) was the most frequent site. The main clinical phenotype was erythema (99.37%). In relation to symptoms, pain (60.76%) was the most reported. On histological examination, all samples showed a dense inflammatory infiltration with predominant plasma cells. The treatment regimens of o-PCM were summarized in six groups: irritant removal; topical/systemic corticosteroids; topical/systemic immunosuppressants/immunomodulators; surgery and similar treatments; radiotherapy and chemotherapy; other therapies, such as antifungals, antibiotics, and antivirals drugs. This is the first systematic review aimed to synthesize the findings of studies on o-PCM. The lack of universally shared information on etiological factors and the absence of international consensus of pharmacological protocols make o-PCM a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 158 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.