Evidence Hub

Omalizumab retreatment in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria:a systematic review of published evidence

Alessandro Tonacci, Eustachio Nettis, Riccardo Asero, Oliviero Rossi, Chiara Tontini, Sebastiano Gangemi

European Annals of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020

7 citations

Abstract

A systematic review of the current literature on retreatment with omalizumab of patients with relapsing chronic spontaneous urticaria was performed.Published evidence shows that retreatment is safe and clinically effective, and that time to complete clinical response reduces as the number of retreatments increases.to four times the licensed antihistamine dose may be beneficial, but around 45% of patients fail to respond (5).For these cases, omalizumab is recommended as add-on therapy, as third-line treatment option.Omalizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody recognizing the Fc portion of the immunoglobulin E (IgE) molecule.It is thought to reduce IgE-and FcεRI-mediated mast cell and basophil activation (6,7), with a similar outcome on both mast cells and basophils.Launched around 20 years ago to treat patients with severe asthma non responsive to standard treatment, it is currently used in several other allergic conditions including refractory CSU since 2013, displaying high efficacy and safety, especially when compared to first-and second-line therapies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free