The effect of allergic rhinitis treatment on asthma control: a systematic review
Abstract
Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are common disorders of the respiratory tract that often coincide. Control of AR symptoms can improve asthma outcomes in patients with co-existing diseases. Our aim is to produce a systematic review of the effectiveness of conventional anti-AR medication for asthma outcomes in patients with both diseases. The Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for publications up to October 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that reported objective (OAO) or subjective asthma outcomes (SAO) and compared the efficacy of anti-AR medication to placebo or conventional asthma medication were included. Included medication interventions were antihistamines (AH), corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists (LRA). We included thirty-three RCTs. Six had an exclusively paediatric study population, 17 a partially paediatric study population. No clinically relevant improvements were seen in SAO. Quality of life (QoL) showed a significant and clinically relevant improvement in five studies. A significant and clinically relevant improvement of OAO was seen in four studies. LRAs did not show significant improvements from baseline. When compared, corticosteroids performed significantly better than LRAs. Significant improvements in both OAO and SAO were seen more often in studies with AHs than with corticosteroids. Anti-allergic initiated AHs and corticosteroids seemed to have a positive effect on asthma outcomes, with AHs having the tendency…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.