Effect of Montelukast on Treatment of Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19): A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) exhibits the most important global public health emergency. Montelukast (MTL), a prototype cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, is commonly considered in the therapy of exercise- and aspirin-induced asthma. The purpose of this study was to present a systematic review of the literature on the effectiveness of MTL against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and exuberant immune activation in COVID‐19 disease. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from the database on August 15, 2021and updated on November 19, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened articles, appraised methodological quality, and extracted the data. Results: A total of 118 related reports were recognized after eliminating duplicates. Of these, 30 references were screened based on titles and abstracts. After removing unrelated studies, 20 studies were included in the full-text review and evaluated for appropriateness. Finally, eight studies fitting the inclusion criteria for data extraction were selected. One of them was a prospective, randomized, controlled, and single-blinded study, three were open-label randomized or non-randomized controlled clinical trials, two were retrospective studies, and two were case series or comparative studies. A total of 1083 patients infected with COVID-19 infection (999 adults and 84 children) were examined on the effectiveness…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,083 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.