Efficacy and safety of Xiangju capsules for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic inflammatory disease, which seriously affects patients' quality of life. Xiangju (XJ) capsules are often used as an adjunctive drug for AR treatment in clinical practice, but its efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated.
Methods: This study systematically searched eight Chinese and English databases for data from inception to 30 November 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating XJ capsules alone or in combination with conventional treatment for AR were included. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were used to test outcome stability. Funnel plots, Egger's regression test and Begg's rank correlation test were used to assess publication bias. When publication bias was detected, its potential influence was further assessed using the trim-and-fill method. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and the quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
Results: A total of 14 RCTs involving 1,968 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that XJ capsules were associated with a higher reported overall effective rate (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.16), lower runny nose scores (SMD = -1.81, 95% CI: -3.36 to -0.27) and lower sneezing scores (SMD = -1.14, 95% CI: -1.86 to -0.41), lower IL-4 levels (SMD = -1.55, 95% CI: -1.93 to -1.16) and lower IgE levels…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,968 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.