Herbal Inhalation Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common immunological disorder characterized by nasal symptoms and impaired quality of life. Despite advances in pharmacotherapy, symptom control often remains inadequate. Herbal medicine atomized inhalation (HMAI), a modern adaptation of traditional East Asian fumigation, may offer an effective adjunct or alternative therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of HMAI, emphasizing its role as a localized drug delivery system. Methods: Six databases were searched through 28 April 2025, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing HMAI for AR. Outcomes were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis; risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 and GRADE. Results: Fourteen RCTs (n = 1606) met the inclusion criteria. HMAI significantly improved total effective rate compared with Western medicine (risk ratio = 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32) and enhanced symptom relief when combined with Western or herbal treatments. However, the overall certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to very low due to methodological limitations across trials. Conclusions: HMAI may offer symptomatic benefits for patients with AR, particularly when used as an adjunct to existing therapies. Given the substantial variability and high risk of bias among included studies, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Rigorous, placebo-controlled trials with standardized…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,606 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.