Optimizing Resistance Training Outcomes: Comparing In-Person Supervision, Online Coaching, and Self-Guided Approaches: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Abstract Gavanda, S, Held, S, Schrey, S, Oberwetter, K, Lazzaro, P-GM, Pergelt, M, and Geisler, S. Optimizing resistance training outcomes: comparing in-person supervision, online coaching, and self-guided approaches: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 39(11): 1129–1137, 2025—This randomized, parallel-group trial investigated the effects of supervised (SUP), app-guided (APP), and self-guided (PDF) 10-week, thrice-weekly full-body resistance training (RT) on strength, body composition, well-being, and supervision satisfaction (S-SRQ) in trained men and women (n = 79, 48% women; 30.7 ± 7.8 years, 1.75 ± 0.1 m, 77.5 ± 17.5 kg). Adherence was highest in SUP (88.2%), followed by APP (81.2%) and PDF (52.2%). At p ≤ 0.05, body mass (+1.8 ± 1.9 kg, p = 0.006) and fat-free mass (+1.4 ± 0.9 kg, p ≤ 0.001) increased significantly in SUP. Muscle mass gains were observed in SUP (+1.4 ± 0.9 kg, p = 0.009) and PDF (+0.9 ± 1.3 kg, p = 0.047). All groups improved squat 1-repetition maximum (1RM) (SUP: +26.6 ± 6.5 kg, p ≤ 0.001; APP: +19.2 ± 11.0 kg, p ≤ 0.001; PDF: +19.4 ± 11.7 kg, p ≤ 0.001) and bench press 1RM (SUP: +9.1 ± 3.5 kg, p ≤ 0.001; APP: +8.2 ± 4.0 kg, p ≤ 0.001; PDF: +7.7 ± 5.8 kg, p ≤ 0.001). Supervised showed significantly greater squat gains than APP and PDF (p ≤ 0.044). Well-being (WHO-5) improved in SUP (+15.7 ± 16.2 points, p ≤ 0.001) and PDF (+9.0 ± 20.4 points, p = 0.032). Satisfaction with supervision was significantly higher in SUP (96.7 ± 4.3%) than in…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 79 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: Cross-Sectional Study Among Medical Students on Application, Education, and Ethical Aspects
- Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study
- The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability evaluation of pancreatic cancer-related video content on social short video platforms: a cross-sectional study
- Quality and reliability of pediatric pneumonia related short videos on mainstream platforms: cross-sectional study
- Association between metabolic score for insulin resistance (METS-IR) and hypertension: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2007–2018
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.