Evidence Hub

Evaluation of melatonin gel as local drug delivery system for the treatment of periodontitis: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial

Anjana J Pratap, R. Srinath, N. Praveen, Prerana Sustarwar, Manasa Sadarjoshi, S. Almalki, I. Gowdar, Khalid Gufran

BMC Oral Health, 2025

24 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

Periodontitis is a polymicrobial, multifactorial infection that affects the supporting structures of teeth. Melatonin, a biomolecule with anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties, has demonstrated promising results in various medical fields, including dentistry. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 1% (w/v) melatonin gel as an adjunct to Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy (NSPT) in improving clinical periodontal parameters, reducing antimicrobial activity against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia, and increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) among patients with stage II periodontitis. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted on 24 periodontitis patients. Two sites per patient were randomly assigned: the test site underwent scaling and root planing (SRP) followed by intra pocket application of 1% melatonin gel, while the control site received SRP alone. Clinical parameters, including the Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI), Periodontal Pocket Depth (PPD), and Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL), were assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Subgingival plaque samples and GCF were collected to evaluate microbial and biochemical changes. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in clinical parameters from baseline to the 3rd month post-therapy. A quantitative reduction in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free