Evidence Hub

SeroCovid19 : prospective seroprevalence monitoring reveals substantially reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among tertiary pediatric patients

Levi Hoste, Agnieszka Prytula-Ebels, Jo L. Dehoorne, Ruth De Bruyne, Stéphanie Van Biervliet, Kathleen De Waele, Petra Schelstraete, Evelyn Maes et al.

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University), 2021

250 participants

Abstract

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a clinically heterogeneous entity with several host, environmental, and viral risk factors identified to date. COVID-19 in children generally manifests asymptomatic or mild. Pediatric patients with chronic medical conditions are potentially at increased risk for severe COVID-19, although convincing data is lacking. Among these children, we aimed to study COVID-19 incidence and disease severity. Methods We initiated a prospective cohort study with longitudinal (every 3-6 months) quantification of serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG (Abbott) and questionnaires in pediatric patients (0-18y) with chronic medical conditions in follow-up at Ghent University Hospital, a tertiary referral center. This interim analysis incorporates inclusions from Nov 1, 2020 until Jan 14, 2021. Results Here, we present data of the first 250 included patients (mean age 10.4y). Chronic conditions required follow-up at departments of immunology (26.4%), nephrology (16.7%), rheumatology (15.4%), gastroenterology (14.5%), endocrinology (8.8%), pulmonology (8.8%) or others (9.3%). Chronic immunosuppressive drugs were used in 35.6%. Inborn errors of immunity, possibly affecting antibody responses, were present in 18.0%. Restriction from school or daycare centers (additional to general lockdown and school closures) was documented in 35.1% and 10.7%, before and after the summer break, respectively. Since the start of the pandemic, close contacts with proven COVID-19 were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 250 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free