Evidence Hub

New phenylcyclopropane-carbohydrazide furan derivatives with potent anticancer activity and EGFR inhibitory potential

Patagani S, Balakrishna K, Naganathappa M, Gorja DR, Katari NK, Velavalapalli VM, Gundla R

RSC advances, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Fifteen new phenylcyclopropane-carbohydrazide-containing furan derivatives are synthesised and thoroughly characterized using FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, and HRMS spectroscopy techniques in the search for new anticancer drugs. Using the MTT assay, this work examines the antiproliferative capability of these newly synthesized phenylcyclopropane hybrid compounds against cancer cell lines of the liver (HepG-2), lung (A549), and breast (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231). Results indicated that with IC50 values of 2.08 ± 0.45, 2.15 ± 0.29, 2.17 ± 0.13, and 3.10 ± 0.32 µM for the MCF-7 cell line, compounds 8e, 8i, 8m, and 8n with p-dimethylamino, p-methoxy, p-hydroxy, and p-chloro-o-methoxy groups, respectively, showed the strongest antiproliferative activity, surpassing the reference drug doxorubicin in some cases. Among the synthesized compounds, 8e, 8j, 8m and 8n were the most active compounds with the EGFRWT inhibitory effect, exhibiting IC50 values of 1.79 ± 0.10, 1.59 ± 0.03, 0.87 ± 0.08, and 0.90 ± 0.60 µM, respectively. Molecular docking studies against the human breast cancer therapy compound and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (PDB codes: 3HB5 & 1M17) revealed that the furan derivatives exhibited excellent binding affinity (-10.70 and -8.54 kcal mol-1) through favorable van der Waals, electrostatic, HB-bonding and CH-bonding interactions within the active site. Furthermore, the ADME-T (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) profiling of the synthesized…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free