The need to update NCRP 151 data for 10 MV linear accelerator bunker shielding based on new measurements and Monte Carlo simulations
Abstract
Linear accelerator bunker shielding protocols such as NCRP 151 have previously been tested against a large sample of measured data from real bunkers and machines but differences in per-energy concrete penetration (TVLs) for 10 MV has not yet been resolved. These differences are likely due to historical beam data and can potentially result in over-exposure of radiation workers and the public. This study examines a cohort of clinical linac bunker survey measurements and compares them to popular shielding protocols. Differences were investigated using contemporary beam data for both Monte Carlo simulation and in analytical equations. For primary barriers, NCRP 151 underestimates the dose rate through concrete by on average a factor of 2 with secondary barriers and maze entrance doses having much better agreement. Use of contemporary beam data in Monte Carlo simulation and an analytical equation yielded TVL values much closer to the measured values compared to NCRP 151. The TVL data in NCRP 151 is outdated and needs to be updated based upon the energy spectra of modern linear accelerators. Until then, physicists should use the TVL values shown in this study instead.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.