Evidence Hub

Exploring the interplay of genetic variants and environmental factors in childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Hao-Xue Zhu, Xing-Hao Yi, Meng-Yu He, Siyi Wu, Ming Li, Shan Gao

Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, 2025

9 citations

Abstract

Dynamic interactions between genetic predispositions and environmental exposures significantly shape the escalating prevalence of childhood obesity. This systematic review synthesizes observational and clinical trial evidence on the gene-environment interplays influencing childhood obesity, highlighting the role of genetic variants and environmental moderators such as dietary habits, physical activity, sleep durations, parental behaviors, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, as well as lifestyle interventions. We conducted an exhaustive search across 5 databases (Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library), adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We ultimately included 147 studies that investigated these interplays in diverse populations. Specifically, 83 studies focused on gene-diet interplays, 23 on gene-physical activity, 5 on sedentary behavior, 3 on screen time, 7 on sleep duration, 10 on parental behavior, 4 on socioeconomic status, 16 on gender, 8 on age, 7 on ethnicity, and 13 on the effects of lifestyle interventions. Notably, we meta-analyzed energy expenditure and macronutrient consumption, including carbohydrates, proteins, and fats, as well as the proportion of energy supplied by each nutrient between carriers and noncarriers of the FTO effect allele, revealing that carriers consumed a higher proportion of fat calories, with no other significant differences noted. This review demonstrates that genetic risk variants, particularly in FTO (e.g.,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free