Is less more? A meta-analysis comparing single-port and multi-port robotic surgery in children
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a recent advancement in minimally invasive techniques, aiming to reduce surgical trauma compared to multi-port (MP) approaches. Nevertheless, its application in pediatric surgery is not yet well defined. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and perioperative outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic surgery in the pediatric population.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched up to June 2024 for studies comparing SP and MP robotic surgery in pediatric patients (0-18 years). Primary outcomes included operative time (OT), console time (CT), blood loss (BL), length of hospital stay (LOS), conversion rates, and complications.
RESULTS
Five retrospective studies, including 147 pediatric patients (87 MP, 60 SP), were analyzed. No significant differences were found in operative time (WMD = 4.56, 95% CI [-23.10, 32.22], P = 0.71), console time (WMD = 3.05, 95% CI [-41.87, 47.96], P = 0.88), or complication rates (OR = 1.32, 95% CI [0.27, 6.59], P = 0.73). Single-port surgery was linked to lower blood loss (WMD = 26.40, 95% CI [-102.70, 155.50], P = 0.0005) and a slightly shorter length of hospital stay (WMD = 0.30, 95% CI [-0.04, 0.55], P = 0.02). Neither group experienced any conversions to open surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
SP robotic surgery appears to be a feasible and safe alternative to MP…
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 147 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Global, regional, and national burden of hepatitis B, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
- A meta‐analysis of anal cancer incidence by risk group: Toward a unified anal cancer risk scale
- Global fertility in 204 countries and territories, 1950–2021, with forecasts to 2100: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021
- Exercise interventions in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- Prognostic Significance of Carbonic Anhydrase IX Expression in Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis
- Glucocorticoid Resistance: Is It a Requisite for Increased Cytokine Production in Depression? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.