Evidence Hub

Biological copper levels in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis with insights into disease progression and prognosis

S. Sundar, Deepak Pandiar, M. Yuwanati

Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 2025

751 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common, aggressive cancer characterized by frequent local invasion, metastasis, and recurrence. Previous research has reported altered copper levels in OSCC; however, studies employed different methods to assess these levels, leading to inconsistent or inaccurate measurements. This variability impacts the evaluation of copper's potential as a biomarker in OSCC. Aim This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate copper concentrations in serum, saliva, and tissue of OSCC patients compared to healthy controls and explore its potential association with disease progression and prognosis. Method ologyA comprehensive search across electronic databases identified 147 studies, with 18 meeting the inclusion criteria following full-text screening. Data from 751 OSCC patients and 628 healthy controls were analysed. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to compute standardized mean differences (SMD). Subgroup analyses based on sample type and analytical technique were performed. Risk of bias was assessed using established quality checklists. Results Serum copper levels were significantly higher in OSCC patients (SMD: 2.22 μg/ml; I2 = 98 %), with improved effect size (SMD: 2.71 μg/ml) after excluding high-risk studies. Salivary copper levels were also elevated (SMD: 0.49 μg/ml), increasing further upon sensitivity analysis (SMD: 0.75 μg/ml; p = 0.02). One study showed markedly higher copper in tumor tissue. Studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 751 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free